Legal rules ought to work themselves out, with unique or difficult cases becoming fewer, and the inconsist..."> Legal rules ought to work themselves out, with unique or difficult cases becoming fewer, and the inconsist..."/>
Image of How Judges Reason
Penanda Bagikan

Text

How Judges Reason

Legal rules ought to work themselves out, with unique or difficult cases becoming fewer, and the inconsistencies in the system disappearing as they are confronted. Instead, legal doctrine and the role of judges has become more difficult and often more controversial. This book offers a general explanation why, and in so doing, analyzes how individuals reason when they behave as judges. Drawing on ideas from philosophical logic, game theory, philosophy of mind, truth theory, and jurisprudence, the author develops a theory of judicial pluralism which suggests that judicial truth is individually objective but societally personal, pluralistic and idiosyncratic.

Ketersediaan
#
Belum memasukkan lokasi Belum memasukkan lokasi
27589
Tersedia
Informasi Detail
Judul Seri
-
No. Panggil
27589
Penerbit
: Peter Lang Pub Incorporated.,
Deskripsi Fisik
267
Bahasa
ISBN/ISSN
-
Klasifikasi
-
Tipe Isi
-
Tipe Media
-
Tipe Pembawa
-
Edisi
-
Subjek
The Logic of Adjudication
Info Detail Spesifik
-
Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
Versi lain/terkait

Tidak tersedia versi lain

Lampiran Berkas
Tidak Ada Data
Komentar
Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar