Parties negotiating the end of authoritarian regimes or armed conflicts are almost inevitably left in a si..."> Parties negotiating the end of authoritarian regimes or armed conflicts are almost inevitably left in a si..."/>
Image of International Criminal Law
Penanda Bagikan

Text

International Criminal Law

Parties negotiating the end of authoritarian regimes or armed conflicts are almost inevitably left in a situation of legal uncertainty. Despite their overlapping scope of application, the differences between the approaches of International Criminal Law (ICL) and Transitional Justice (TJ) are so profound that, unless dogmatisms are left aside and a process of dialogue is entered into, it will not be possible to harmonize the current legal regime of international crimes with the need to articulate transitional processes that are capable of effectively overcoming authoritarian regimes and armed conflicts. The serious material limitations shown by national, international and hybrid ICL enforcement mechanisms should be acknowledged and the goals pursued by ICL should be redefined accordingly. A minimum level of consensus on the scope of application, goals and elements of TJ should also be reached. Situations of systematic or large scale violence against the civilian population by transnational criminal organizations increase the challenge.

Ketersediaan
#
Belum memasukkan lokasi Belum memasukkan lokasi
31826
Tersedia
Informasi Detail
Judul Seri
-
No. Panggil
31826
Penerbit
: Brill - Nijhoff.,
Deskripsi Fisik
234
Bahasa
ISBN/ISSN
9789004340992
Klasifikasi
-
Tipe Isi
-
Tipe Media
-
Tipe Pembawa
-
Edisi
-
Subjek
Transnational Criminal Organizations and Transitio
Info Detail Spesifik
-
Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
Versi lain/terkait

Tidak tersedia versi lain

Lampiran Berkas
Tidak Ada Data
Komentar
Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar